Planning and Zoning

Planning and Zoning

Expanding Housing Choice in Clackamas County

HB 2001 Implementation Project

Update 7/1/22

As of July 1, 2022, the new middle housing rules are in effect. Learn more.

Update 6/6/22

On June 2, 2022, the Board of Commissioners adopted amendments to the Zoning & Development Ordinance (ZDO) and Comprehensive Plan to allow for middle housing (duplexes, townhouses, triplexes, quadplexes and cottage clusters) on urban residential land in unincorporated Clackamas County. The amendments will be effective July 1, 2022.
Approved documents:

Questions about developing middle housing? Contact Principal Planner Martha Fritzie at mfritzie@clackamas.us or 503-742-4529.

Background

Expanding housing choice in Clackamas County means providing more housing types and options for residents. Housing in Clackamas County is becoming less affordable, and House Bill 2001 (HB 2001), approved by the state legislature in 2019, will allow property owners to build up the supply of housing — resulting in a wider range of housing types that can provide more affordable housing options in urban, unincorporated Clackamas County.

State law requires that the county amend its Zoning and Development Ordinance (ZDO), and, if necessary, Comprehensive Plan, by June 30, 2022, to allow for this development of middle housing in urban unincorporated, residential zones.

For information about county land use efforts underway to support housing throughout the county, go to Land Use Housing Strategies.

House Bill 2001 (HB 2001)

House Bill 2001 requires Oregon cities and counties to allow “middle housing” in urban residential zones that already allow houses. The purpose of the state law and the county’s HB 2001 Implementation Project is to increase the amount of lower-cost market-rate housing available in residential areas. Since middle housing — townhouses, duplexes, cottage clusters, quadplexes, etc. — can be less expensive to build than conventional single-family houses and new apartment complexes, it may be possible to charge lower rents or sale prices. Also, middle housing will be allowed in more locations than apartment complexes are allowed in today, which may result in the development of more new housing units. The law does not eliminate the option to build single-family homes.

Types of Middle Housing

Middle housing includes duplexes, triplexes, quadplexes (also known as fourplexes), townhouses, cottage clusters (several small houses centered on a common area such as a lawn or courtyard) and accessory dwelling units (ADUs).

Clackamas County already allows ADUs per state law. (ADUs are a secondary house or apartment unit that is on the same lot as a larger, primary house.)

Examples

Meetings

2022
June 2 Board of Commissioners Business Meeting
May 11 Board of Commissioners Land Use Hearing
April 27 Board of Commissioners Land Use Hearing
March 28 Planning Commission Public Hearing
March 14 Planning Commission Study Session
Feb. 22 Online Video Chat with Staff about Proposed Middle Housing Codes
video
Feb. 2 Board of Commissioners Planning Session
Jan. 24 Planning Commission Study Session
materials
2021
Nov. 9 Board of County Commissioners Issues Session
materials
Oct. 25 Planning Commission Study Session
materials

Project Timeline

HB 2001 timeline

Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
On

Park Avenue Next Steps: Considering Alternatives

 

Study Area
Click to Enlarge

WHAT: How can we make a more walkable, mass-transit friendly community? Clackamas County is working with Oak Grove neighbors to create updated land-use development and design standards for the area near the Park Avenue Max Station. The goal will be to support economic growth and protect neighborhoods around this area.

WHERE: Within a half mile of the light rail station at Park Avenue and McLoughlin Boulevard in Oak Grove, just south of the city of Milwaukie.

GOALS:

  1. Increase employment opportunities, promote innovative business ventures and enhance access to business and community services, amenities, while remaining sensitive to existing businesses.
  2. Increase the diversity and accessibility of housing choices adjacent to transit, along McLoughlin Boulevard, and along the near side streets, while maintaining sensitivity to existing residences.
  3. Provide safe locations, crossings and connections for walking, biking, transit and parking.
  4. Cultivate a heart and hub of neighborhood activity supported by a network of community gathering spaces that are safe and welcoming both day and night.
  5. Treat natural systems as a benefit and an integral part of our community identity by preserving, promoting and enhancing native natural elements at a variety of scales.
  6. Promote resilient, sustainable systems and infrastructure.

What we heard so far: We learned from people who attended our last workshop in February that they interested in the following community features to be a key part of future design of the area.

Jobs opportunities

  • Local grocery and small businesses to serve the neighborhood
  • Diverse choices jobs and businesses
  • Retail
  • Childcare

Housing

  • More housing density, but designed appropriately for the area
  • A range of housing types in varying densities (such as duplexes, apartments and co-housing communities
  • Housing for workers
  • Housing development that prioritizes accessibility for pedestrians and bicyclists, with flexible parking solutions, green spaces and required sustainability features

Transportation

  • Improve access to Park Avenue station area
  • Promote equitable access to all modes
  • Improve safety along the Trolley Trail

Community Gathering Spaces

  • Space for food trucks, dog parks, places to play and have events
  • Encourage open space around housing development

Green Spaces and Natural Features

  • Preserve existing trees and natural features
  • Planted median on Highway 99E (McLoughlin Boulevard)
  • Encourage courtyards and green roofs

Sustainability and Climate Resiliency

  • Eco-sensitive housing density
  • Community gardens to support surrounding housing
  • E.V. charging and/or car share

Two alternatives to consider

A framework plan is a map that shows a 20-year vision and big ideas for the future of a neighborhood. The framework plan helps inform design and development standards, but it is not a zoning code and it is flexible enough to adapt to changing conditions in the community.

What is in a framework plan?

The framework plan provides suggestions for locating the following elements:

  • Types of development (housing, job opportunities, businesses, etc.)Pedestrian and bicycle improvements (like paths, sidewalks, etc.)
  • Street crossing improvements
  • Hubs of neighborhood activity and community gathering spaces
  • Opportunities for landscape and planting improvements

Option A

Option B

Transform McLoughlin
Click to Enlarge

Village
Click to Enlarge

The Transform McLoughlin alternative is focused on improving conditions along McLoughlin Boulevard to make it more conducive to development and inviting to pedestrians.  It maintains McLoughlin as the primary circulator for auto-oriented and bike/pedestrian traffic, but offers substantial improvements along McLoughlin to make it safer and more accessible for everyone.

  • New bicycle and pedestrian connections to the Trolley Trail and mid-block crossings across McLoughlin would create shorter blocks to make the roadway more welcoming and accessible to the neighborhood.
  • Mixed-use development with innovative employment opportunities like a makerspace, healthcare or child care would be encouraged along McLoughlin between Park and Courtney.
  • Active street design on buildings -- such as storefronts with windows, sidewalk seating and awnings, along with an enhanced pedestrian environment, would make the area more inviting to pedestrians.
  • Enhancements could include wider sidewalks, planting buffers and slower traffic speeds.

The Village Main Street alternative concentrates mixed-use development (retail and housing), and bike and pedestrian traffic along a new corridor parallel to McLoughlin, between McLoughlin and the Trolley Trail and adjacent residential development.

  • This internal main street off of Park Ave and McLoughlin Blvd would encourage a walkable neighborhood core with multifamily residential development and active ground floor businesses to serve the neighborhood.
  • A secondary concentration of mixed-use, pedestrian development at the intersection of Courtney and McLoughlin would serve the south side of the neighborhood, with general commercial areas along the middle section of the McLoughlin corridor inside the project area.
  • An internal bike/pedestrian pathway would connect the two neighborhood centers.
  • Active street design at both major intersections and mid-block connections between Oatfield, McLoughlin and the Trolley Trail would improve the safety of walking and biking through the neighborhood, and create a network of greenspaces and community gathering spaces.

 

Now, we’d like give you a chance to let us know your preferences for the future of the Park Avenue area. Just click on the Survey link below. Thank you!

Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
On

Land Use Housing Strategies

Supporting the development of a more affordable variety of housing in unincorporated Clackamas County

The Planning & Zoning Division has compiled information and data to develop a three-phase strategy to help ensure that the county’s Comprehensive Plan and Zoning & Development Ordinance (ZDO) support meeting the growing need for more housing options in Clackamas County. The details are available in Long-Range Planning Issue Paper 2020-1, Housing Strategies Related to Comprehensive Plan and Zoning & Development Ordinance Updates, Feb. 11, 2020.

Board approves code amendments to expand housing options

On Nov. 3, the Board of County Commissioners approved several changes to the Zoning and Development Ordinance (ZDO) to encourage the development of more multifamily housing in urban unincorporated Clackamas County.  Specifically, amendments were approved that will:

  • Provide residential developers with additional entitlements (such as more units) in exchange for providing housing that is affordable for low-income households
  • Increase maximum allowed housing density in some unincorporated commercial zones from 25 units per acre to 60 units per acre;
  • Allow a 20 percent density bonus for housing in mixed-use development in those unincorporated commercial zones;
  • Reduce overall parking requirements for multifamily developments in unincorporated commercial and residential areas, and
  • Reduce parking requirements for multifamily developments within ¼ mile walking distance of a light-rail station.

The BCC action, which implements several of the recommendations from the 2019 Housing Affordability and Homelessness Task Force, was shaped during came at the end of a nearly The action came at the end of a nearly two-year-long process of studying and gathering input on these proposals, as well as public hearings before the Planning Commission and Board of Commissioners.

More information about the actions taken is available in the material provided for the Oct. 6 and Nov. 3 Board Land Use Hearings

The Need

Housing chart

Housing in Clackamas County is becoming less affordable. Exacerbating this problem is a deficit in buildable residential land in the urban unincorporated area. Based on estimates in the Clackamas County Regional Housing Needs Analysis (HNA) from September 2019, unincorporated Clackamas County lacks residentially-zoned land for as many as 5,000 housing units needed in the next 20 years, over half of which would be multi-family units to meet anticipated demand.

The analysis in the HNA identifies a need for additional housing types for a range of income levels and at a range of sizes, in part, to respond to the preferences of the Baby Boomers and Millennials that make up a growing portion of the population. One challenge is that, while the county has a need for a wide range of housing solutions to serve households at varying income levels, there remains a tendency for low-density residential development to dominate the new construction market.

To meet the range of needs identified in the HNA and facilitate the development of housing that better serves the needs of all the county’s residents, several strategies need to be deployed:

  • Through implementation of programs administered by the county’s Department of Health, Housing and Human Services (H3S) and non-profits organizations, and
  • Through changes to the land use regulations implemented by the Department of Transportation and Development (DTD) through the Planning & Zoning Division.

Strategies

Phase 1

  1. Housing density in commercial zones
    • Land use regulations often include limits to the number of dwelling units that can be built on a particular piece of land. This limit, described as a number of units per acre, is referred to as “housing density.” One way to facilitate more housing development is to allow for more housing density. The county is considering increasing the housing density allowed for multi-family housing developed on certain lands zoned for commercial uses like retail and shops, services, offices, restaurants and lodging, child care and adult daycare, entertainment, etc.
    • Currently, the Clackamas County code allows for multi-family homes to be built in most commercial zones, but in many areas restricts the density of that housing to no more than 25 units per acre.  Increasing the number of housing units allowed per acre close to commercial areas and job centers could substantially improve housing opportunities for people who want, or need, to be closer to such services.
  2. Multi-family parking requirements
    • Parking requirements can impact the type and density of housing developers can afford to build and people can afford to rent or buy. Constructing required parking can be a significant cost for multi-family housing developments, which then can result in increased rents or sales prices.  In addition, reducing the number of required parking spaces could provide enough space for more housing units on a property. Not providing enough parking, however, could lead to people seeking parking on neighboring streets, which can be a problem for everyone in the area.  
    • Currently, Clackamas County code requires all multi-family residential developments to provide 1.25 to 1.75 parking spaces per housing unit, depending on the number of bedrooms. The code does not allow for a developer to ask for a lower parking requirement even if the development will be serving low-income households with fewer cars, or if the development is located near a public transit station.  
    • Modifying parking standards could provide expanded housing opportunities.
  3. Affordable housing bonus
    • Some jurisdictions allow a developer to build more housing units or a larger building and have flexibility in other standards (such as parking, landscaping, etc.) in exchange for ensuring that some of those housing units are affordable for lower income households. This type of flexibility is commonly referred to as an “affordable housing bonus”.
    • Currently, Clackamas County has a minimal and rarely used affordable housing bonus program -- 1 additional unit allowed for each affordable unit, up to 8% of base density.  (For example, if the allowed density is 100 units and a developer proposes to make eight or more units affordable, they could add up to eight units to the project.) We are considering ways to provide a more meaningful affordable housing bonus that would provide incentives for developers to build affordable units.
  4. Transitional shelters

Phase 2

  1. Middle housing (HB 2001)
    • House Bill 2001 (HB 2001), passed by the state legislature in 2019, requires the county to: 
      • allow a duplex on any urban lot zoned for a detached single-family home, and 
      • allow triplexes, quadplexes, cottage clusters and townhouses in urban areas zoned for a detached single-family home. 
    • Required under state law; effective July 1, 2022  
  2. Clear and objective standards (S1051)
    • The county is required to have a “clear and objective” path for all types of housing development. This requires an audit of the county’s standards for development of individual housing units and for residential land divisions.
    • Required under state law (Senate Bill 1051, approved in 2017) 
  3. Comprehensive Plan policies for rezoning in low density residential districts
    • Comprehensive Plan text amendments to clarify zone change policies and potentially restrict zone changes in urban low-density residential areas.

Context for strategies

The strategies were developed within the context of:

  • Current local, regional and state regulatory framework
  • Available resources, including staff time and budget
  • The Clackamas County Regional Housing Needs Analysis from September 2019
    • Identified needs
    • Recommendations
    • Does the strategy increase places for new housing units?
  • The Housing Affordability and Homelessness Task Force from 2018-2019
    • Does the strategy address task force recommendations and policies identified to address housing affordability and homelessness in the county?
  • Equity, including:
    • Does the strategy improve access to housing?
    • Does the strategy improve housing stability?
    • Does the strategy limit potential for displacement?
  • Legislative mandates, including:
  • The 2019-21 Long-Range Planning Work Program

Meetings

Board and Planning Commission

2021
Dec. 2 Board of Commissioners Business Meeting
10 a.m.
materials
Nov. 3 Board of Commissioners (for deliberation only)
9:30 a.m.
materials
Oct. 6 Board of Commissioners Public Hearing
9:30 a.m.
materials
Aug. 23 Planning Commission Public Hearing
6:30 p.m.
materials
July 12 Planning Commission Study Session
6:30 p.m.
materials
June 15 BCC Policy Session
2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
packet video
April 28 BCC Planning Session
9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
packet video
2020
June 30 BCC Policy Session
Update on Rulemaking for House Bill (HB) 2001 (2019), related to “Middle Housing” and HB2003 (2019), related to “Needed Housing" (Virtual Meeting)
Feb. 11 BCC Policy Session
materials
Jan. 27 Planning Commission meeting
background presentation
2019
Dec. 10 Housing Affordability and Homelessness Task Force Priority Recommendations and Final Report
materials
Update of Department of Transportation and Development Housing Strategies Project
materials
Sept. 23 Joint Board of County Commissioners / Planning Commission Work Session
memo presentation

Technical Working Group

2021
Jan. 21

3 p.m. to 5 p.m.

agenda Phase 1 Strategies Update Housing Strategies and Health Equity Lens Survey Results Meeting Notes, Oct. 21, 2020

2020
Oct. 21

1 p.m. to 3 p.m.

agenda

Sept. 2 4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m. agenda

Project Timeline

Project Timeline

Public Engagement

Equitable public engagement and involvement are integral to the success of this project and will take place throughout all phases.  The primary public engagement objectives are to:

  • Understand the community’s priorities and concerns with regard to potential changes that may take place in their neighborhoods as a result of implementation of these strategies.
  • Collaborate with community partners to advance socioeconomic, racial and transportation equity in Clackamas County to create a set of potential solutions that will be responsive to the different needs of diverse communities.
    Lay the groundwork for updating policies and regulations to ensure the updates will be responsive to the needs of urban communities in the county.
  • Help ensure successful passage of code amendments through the adoption process.

There will be many varied opportunities for interested people and organizations to be involved with this important project, including community work groups, webinars, online questionnaires, presentations to community groups, etc.  For more information, contact Martha Fritzie at mfritzie@clackamas.us.  

Learn More

Interested in learning more?  Want to know about future meetings (virtual or otherwise) and actions related to this project?  Let us know who you are and how we can reach you and we’ll add you to our email list.

Just send an email to Ellen Rogalin at ellenrog@clackamas.us with your name and email address.  Thank you!

Resources

Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
On

Clackamas County Transit Development Plan

Transit Development PlanClackamas County’s first-ever Transit Development Plan was approved by the Board of County Commissioners on April 29, 2021.

The plan sets the stage for improved and increased transit throughout the county. With seven transit service providers in Clackamas County, there are still large areas of the county with no transit service, and existing service varies in frequency, access and connectivity. The final plan  is being used to guide transit investments in the county.

Areas of Focus

  1. Inside TriMet’s service district (orange area of the map)
    • Includes most cities inside the Metro urban growth boundary (UGB), extending to Estacada; including a large portion of the rural area along Stafford Road
    • Work to be done: detailed analysis and level of service information
  2. Unincorporated Clackamas County with no transit service (gray area of the map)
    • Develop recommendations for how transit service providers can connect through these areas
    • Work to be done: Review connections in areas outside the jurisdictions of current transit providers:

Transit Service Providers in Clackamas County

Transit Service Providers

Project Advisory Committee

Stakeholders and residents from throughout the County met regularly to review project information and plans, make suggestions and recommend the final Transit Development Plan. Meetings will be open to the public and include time for public comment.

Meeting Schedule

Jan. 26, 2021
5 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.
Held via Zoom
agenda presentation summary
Nov. 4, 2020 Held via Zoom
agenda presentation summary
July 28, 2020 Held via Zoom
agenda presentation summary
May 12, 2020 Held via Zoom
agenda presentation summary

Project Advisory Committee (PAC) Members

Name Organization
Cristina Reynaga South Clackamas Transportaiton District Board of Directors
Linda Howland South Metro Area Regional Transit Dial-a-Ride Steering Committee
Laura Edmonds North Clackamas Chamber of Commerce
Michelle Emery Todos Juntos Transit Provider
Glenn Koehrsen Aging Services Advisory Council
Stephen McMurtrey Clackamas County Housing Authority
Jackson Calhoun Rex Putnam Earth Club
Bobbi Bryan Redland-Viola-Fischers Mill CPO
Maggie Anderson Clackamas Community College Student

Background

HB 2017-Keep Oregon Moving*, created a new funding source for transit operations and capital expenditures. Aside from the Mt. Hood Express, Clackamas County is not a transit provider. However, areas outside of a transit district or service area also have the opportunity to receive funding for transit, contingent upon having a plan that identifies priority transit needs and investments. The small city transit providers have worked closely to coordinate an “out-of-TriMet district” set of investments for the initial TriMet STIF plan. During this planning process, a need was identified to create a single document addressing the connections between service provider areas, and to identify ways in which coordination and cooperation can be improved throughout the Study Area.

*HB 2017-Keep Oregon Moving, created a new funding source for transit operations and capital expenditures. Areas outside of a transit district or service area have the opportunity to receive funding for transit, contingent upon having a plan that identifies priority transit needs and investments.

In December 2018, Metro approved an updated Regional Transit Strategy with additional guidance on providing better transit service. The Service Enhancement Plans and the Regional Transit Strategy, as well as priority service improvements identified in the TriMet STIF plan, will be the foundation for the work of the CCTDP within the TriMet service area.

In June 2018, the County hosted a Transit and Housing Workshop where professional staff from jurisdictions throughout the Study Area discussed actions needed to increase access to housing and jobs through better transit service. These concepts will be explored further during the Project to provide guidance on ways to make transit service a more viable option to choice riders, identify the types of transit facilities needed to support transit connections, bring forward innovative ways to provide service in rural and suburban locations, and provide input into land use actions that support transit.

Detailed Project Objectives

  • Assess the transit level-of-service to identify gaps in transit service and coverage;
  • Assess the connections between transit and land use and identify potential actions to improve land use transit-supportiveness;
  • Identify opportunities to meet the transportation/transit needs of vulnerable populations and to provide access to destinations that are important to vulnerable populations;
  • Identify transit equity issues that exist for low-income households and identify connections to provide better access to employment and housing for transit dependent populations;
  • Enhance coordination between transit service providers and provide guidance on seamless access to transit options regionally by evaluating technology integration and fare uniformity;
  • Provide strategic guidance for service improvements that will address the findings in the above assessments and improve the integration between systems from a County perspective;
  • Address issues emerging from Metro’s 2018 Regional Transit Strategy, such as implementation of the enhanced transit concept, transit expansion and first/last mile connections;
  • Integrate a range of transit options, such as shuttles, express service, vanpools, micro transit and Transportation Network Companies (i.e., Uber and Lyft);
  • Identify priority transit service enhancements that can be integrated into future STIF plans and TriMet planning, and other planning work or funding opportunities; and
  • Preserve the function of state highways by expanding regional public transit availability and reducing the number of single-occupancy vehicles on the road.

Just the Facts

Funding: $175,200 from the federal Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), through a Transportation & Growth Management grant from the Oregon Department of Transportation.

Timeline: January 2020 – January 2021

For more information:

Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
On

Clackamas County Street Tree List

Updated October 2020

Clackamas County property owners within the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary are responsible for the upkeep and maintenance of street trees in the public right-of-way or planter strip adjacent to their property.  

Before selecting a tree to plant in the planter strip, make sure that the tree is on Clackamas County’s approved Street Tree List and is appropriate for your site conditions. When looking at the site conditions, think about the tree today and at maturity, when it reaches its full height and width. You can find guidance for the placement of street trees in Standard Drawing L100 and Standard Drawing L200 of Clackamas County Roadway Standards.

What is a planter strip?

The planter strip is the area in which street trees are planted; the land between the edge of the roadway and the private property line.  In areas with sidewalks, the planter strip is usually the grassy area between the street and the sidewalk.

What is a street tree?

Street trees are trees planted in the public right-of-way in the planter strip.
Trees provide environmental benefits, such as storm water retention, shade, wildlife habitat and reduced energy consumption. Trees help to bolster property values in residential and commercial areas, and improve the aesthetic appeal of urban streets.  Street trees can also help to calm traffic and provide separation between car traffic and pedestrian areas.

If properly selected and planted with sufficient space to grow, urban trees can provide all of the above benefits at little cost. However, trees do have a life span. Sometimes an incompatible tree species is planted or grows in the wrong location, which may result in lifting sidewalks or cracked curbs. In this situation, the county may issue a permit for the tree to be removed as long as it is replaced with a more appropriate species. Similarly, trees that are dead, diseased or hazardous, as verified by a certified arborist, must be replaced.

Approved Street Trees List

It is important to plant a species of tree in the planter strip that will provide aesthetic and environmental benefits without eventually causing damage to the sidewalk or roadway. Therefore, the county has four lists of appropriate street trees, based on the width of the planter strip:

To select a tree from the list, first check the width of the planter strip in front of your property to make sure you use the right list.
The list also includes other valuable information that may be helpful to you as you decide which type of tree to plant.

  • Native Species 
    If you’re looking for a tree native to the Pacific Northwest, we have noted the tree species that are native to areas west of the Cascade Mountains.
  • Height 
    The number on the list is the tree’s maximum height when it is allowed to grow to maturity with no constraints. (Please note that some types of trees planted in narrow planting strip areas may not grow to full height.)
  • Canopy Width 
    The number of on the list is the maximum width of the tree’s branches and leaves at maturity.  This is important not just for shade and aesthetic considerations, but also because many trees grow out roots to the approximate width of the canopy in order to capture water that drips off leaves. Therefore, it is especially important to pay attention to canopy width when planting a tree near underground utilities.
  • Evergreen
    Whether the species of tree is one that keeps its leaves or needles year-round or drops them in the fall
  • Allowed Under Overhead Wires 
    It is particularly important not to plant a tree that will eventually interfere with any overhead utility wires that cross over the planter strip.  If there are wires where you’re planting, please be sure to check this column to make sure the species you’ve selected will not cause problems in the future.
  • Shape
    • NarrowNarrow
      slender, oval or teardrop-like growth
    • RoundRound
      width similar in size to height; may also be oval or umbrella-shaped
    • VaseVase
      largest canopy near the top of the tree, with narrower growth below
    • pyramidPyramid
      tapered, with a wide base and narrow peak
Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
On

Long-Range Planning Work Program

Since 2012, the Planning and Zoning Division has prepared a Long-Range Planning Work Program to prioritize and consolidate amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning & Development Ordinance (ZDO). Public involvement with the work program allows for the integration of projects important to the community, as well as increased community awareness about current long-range planning projects.

2023-25 Work Program

The 2023-25 Long-Range Planning Work Program focuses on several land use items that were postponed from the 2021-23 program and some transportation planning projects that are in process. The program was approved by the Board of Commissioners on Aug. 9, 2023.

Meetings

Aug. 9, 2023    
10 a.m.
Board of Commissioners Policy Session    
Packet   
Video
April 27, 2021    
1:30 p.m.
Board of Commissioners Policy Session    
Packet
March 8, 2021    
6:30 p.m.
Planning Commission Public Meeting    
Agenda    
Packet    
Audio
Feb. 9, 2021    
2:30 p.m.
Board of County Commissioners Policy Session    
Packet    
Video
Jan. 11, 2021    
6:30 p.m.
Planning Commission Study Session    
Overview of input received for 2021-23 Long-Range Planning Work Program

2021-23 Long-Range Planning Work Program

Community members and organizations were invited to submit ideas for projects to consider. After gathering input from the Planning Commission, staff met with the Planning Commission to discuss and make a recommendation to the Board of Commissioners. The plan recommended by the Planning Commission was approved by the Board of Commissioners on April 27, 2021 and revised in October 2022.

2019-2021 Long-Range Planning Work Program

The 2019-21 Long-Range Planning Work Program was structured around the need to update the Comprehensive Plan in four major areas: Housing, Transportation, Economics, and Natural Resources and Energy. Plan projects were chosen after seeking suggestions from the public, county departments and other jurisdictions, reviewed by the Planning Commission and approved by the Board of County Commissioners.

Contact
Department Staff
Karen Buehrig
Long-Range Planning Manager
503-742-4683
Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
On